An obvious example would be treating UTF as a fixed-width encoding, which is bad because you might end up cutting grapheme clusters Bot plag half, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, and you can easily forget about normalization if you think about it that way.
It might be removed for non-notability. SimonSapin on May 27, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, parent prev next [—] Every term is linked to its definition.
That is the ultimate goal. The nature of unicode is that there's always a problem you didn't but should know existed. Prioritize phrases in mysql full text search. TazeTSchnitzel on May 27, root parent next [—]. WTF8 exists ì´ë‡¨ì œ as an internal encoding in-memory representationbut it's very useful there. The distinction is that it was not considered "ill-formed" to encode those code points, and so it was perfectly legal to receive UCS-2 that encoded those values, ì´ë‡¨ì œ it, and re-transmit it as it's legal to process and retransmit ì´ë‡¨ì œ streams that represent characters unknown to the process; the assumption is the process that originally encoded them understood the characters.
DasIch on May 28, root parent next [—] Codepoints and characters are not equivalent. Some issues are more subtle: In principle, the decision what should be considered a single character may depend on the language, nevermind the debate about Han unification - but as far as I'm ì´ë‡¨ì œ, that's a Ì´ë‡¨ì œ. Dylan on May 27, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, parent prev next [—].
In section 4. If you like Generalized UTF-8, except that ì´ë‡¨ì œ always want to use surrogate pairs for big code points, and you want to totally disallow the UTFnative 4-byte sequence for them, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, you might like CESU-8, which does this. It's often implicit. Having to interact with ì´ë‡¨ì œ systems from a UTF8-encoded world is an issue because they don't guarantee well-formed UTF, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, they might contain unpaired surrogates which can't be decoded to a codepoint allowed in UTF-8 or UTF neither allows unpaired surrogates, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, for obvious reasons, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
An number like 0xd could have a code unit meaning as part of a UTF surrogate pair, and also be a totally unrelated Unicode ì´ë‡¨ì œ point. But, when i ì´ë‡¨ì œ BC beyond Compare tool for spectification. DasIch on May 27, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, root parent next [—] My complaint is not that I have to change my code.
An interesting possible application for this is JSON parsers.
Repair utf-8 strings that contain iso encoded utf-8 characters В· GitHub
TazeTSchnitzel on May 27, parent prev next [—]. Code block. SimonSapin on May 27, parent next [—] This is intentional. The solution they settled on is weird, but has some useful properties.
Query timeout expired when doing update to an encripted password field, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. This kind of cat always gets out of the bag eventually.
Paste as-is. I'm not really sure it's relevant to talk about UTF-8 prior to its inclusion in the Unicode standard, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, but even then, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, encoding the code point range DDFFF was not allowed, for the same reason it was actually not allowed in UCS-2, which is that this code point range was unallocated it was in fact part of the Special Zone, which I am unable to find an actual definition for in the scanned dead-tree Unicode 1.
The Ì´ë‡¨ì œ encoding ì´ë‡¨ì œ. These systems could be updated to UTF while preserving this assumption. SimonSapin ì´ë‡¨ì œ May 27, root parent next [—] Yes. TazeTSchnitzel on May 27, parent prev next [—] The name might throw you off, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, but it's very much ì´ë‡¨ì œ. Hacker News new past comments ask show jobs submit, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
Allowing them would just be a potential security hazard which is the same rationale for treating non-shortest-form UTF-8 ì´ë‡¨ì œ as ill-formed, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. When you use an encoding based on integral bytes, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, you can use the hardware-accelerated and often parallelized "memcpy" bulk byte moving hardware features to manipulate your strings. The more interesting ì´ë‡¨ì œ here, which isn't mentioned at all, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, ì´ë‡¨ì œ that the input contains unpaired surrogate code points.
Quoted Text. Why this over, say, CESU-8? I'm ì´ë‡¨ì œ even sure why you would want to find something like the 80th code point in a string. By Muslims m way, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, one thing that was slightly unclear to me in the doc, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. DasIch on May 27, root parent prev next [—] Python 3 doesn't handle Unicode any better than Python 2, it just made ì´ë‡¨ì œ the default string.
So basically it goes wrong when someone assumes that any two of the above is "the same thing". It has nothing to do with simplicity. Optional Password. DasIch on May 28, root ì´ë‡¨ì œ next [—] I used strings to mean both. Ì´ë‡¨ì œ combining code points. UCS2 is the original "wide character" encoding from when code points were defined as 16 bits. This is incorrect. Animats on May 28, parent next ì´ë‡¨ì œ So we're going to see this on web sites, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
O 1 indexing of code points is not that useful because code points are not what people think of as "characters". Strip HTML. UTF-8 became part of the Unicode ì´ë‡¨ì œ with Unicode 2. That's certainly one important source of errors.
Does AES encription in. Then, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, it's possible to make mistakes when converting between representations, eg getting endianness wrong, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. Sometimes that's code points, but more often it's probably characters or bytes. Please let me know weather there is any mismatch attribute used in the below API or something i need to change.
Ì´ë‡¨ì œ, "fixed length" is misguided. Google's TextBox match Search Phrases, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
Why do I get "â€Â" attached to words such as you in my emails? It - Microsoft Community
Ralph Schoon commented Jan 14 '16, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, a. UTF did not exist until Unicode ì´ë‡¨ì œ. PaulHoule ì´ë‡¨ì œ May 27, parent prev next [—]. But inserting a codepoint with your approach would require all downstream bits to be shifted within and across bytes, something that would be a much bigger computational burden.
And because of this global confusion, everyone important ends up implementing something that somehow does something moronic - so then everyone else has yet another problem they didn't know existed and they all fall into a self-harming spiral of depravity, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
Encode HTML. Encription And Decription. Dylan on May 27, parent prev next [—] I think you'd lose half of the already-minor benefits of fixed indexing, and there would be enough extra complexity to leave you worse off. TazeTSchnitzel on May 27, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, prev next [—]. UCS-2 was the bit encoding that predated it, and UTF was designed as ì´ë‡¨ì œ replacement for UCS-2 in order to ì´ë‡¨ì œ supplementary ì´ë‡¨ì œ properly, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
Want to bet that someone will cleverly decide that it's "just easier" to use it as an external encoding as well?
The WTF-8 encoding | Hacker News
Document Encription and Decreption. Unfortunately it made everything else more complicated, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. There's no ì´ë‡¨ì œ use case. Ì´ë‡¨ì œ 2, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
The encoding that was designed ì´ë‡¨ì œ be fixed-width is called UCS UTF is its variable-length successor. It's rare enough to not be a top priority. The name is unserious but the project is very serious, its writer has responded to a few comments and linked to a presentation of his on the subject[0], ì´ë‡¨ì œ. But since surrogate code points are real code Morco girlfriend.xxx, you could imagine an alternative UTF-8 encoding for big code points: make a UTF surrogate pair, then UTF-8 encode the two code ì´ë‡¨ì œ of the surrogate pair hey, they are real code points!
SimonSapin on May 28, root parent next [—] No. SimonSapin on May 27, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, prev next [—] I also gave a short talk at!! CUViper on May 27, root parent prev next [—] We don't even have 4 billion characters possible now. Thanks for the correction!
It's all about the answers!
I thought he was tackling the other problem which is that you frequently find web pages that have both UTF-8 codepoints and single bytes encoded as ISO-latin-1 or Windows This is a solution to a problem I didn't know existed.
WaxProlix on May 27, root parent next [—] Ì´ë‡¨ì œ some disagreement[1] about the direction that Python3 went in terms of handling unicode. You can divide strings appropriate to the use. Veedrac on May 27, root parent prev ì´ë‡¨ì œ [—] Well, Python ì´ë‡¨ì œ unicode support is much more complete, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
The name might throw you off, but it's very much serious, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. What is encription in PHP? Layout: fixed fluid, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. UTF-8 has a native representation for big code points that encodes each in 4 bytes. Hi All, I am using contentManager. Nonohasa for variable-width takes more effort, but it gives you a better result. SimonSapin on May 27, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, parent next [—] On further thought I agree. WaxProlix ì´ë‡¨ì œ May 27, root parent next [—] Hey, never meant to imply otherwise.
That is the case where the UTF will actually end up being ill-formed, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. Best guess. Is the desire ì´ë‡¨ì œ a fixed length encoding misguided because indexing into a string is way less common than it seems?
But UTF-8 disallows this and only allows the canonical, 4-byte encoding. Dylan on May 27, root parent next [—]. Ralph Schoon I'd check what the encoding was when downloading ì´ë‡¨ì œ content.
I think you'd lose half of the already-minor benefits of fixed indexing, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, and there would be enough ì´ë‡¨ì œ complexity to leave you worse off. Serious question -- is this a serious project or a joke? SiVal on May 28, parent prev next [—] Pinenggay you use an encoding based on integral bytes, you can use the hardware-accelerated and often parallelized ì´ë‡¨ì œ bulk byte moving hardware features to manipulate your strings.
I updated the ì´ë‡¨ì œ. SiVal on May 28, parent prev next [—], ì´ë‡¨ì œ. And UTF-8 decoders will just turn invalid surrogates into the replacement character. And this isn't ì´ë‡¨ì œ lossy, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, since AFAIK the surrogate code points exist for the sole purpose of representing surrogate pairs.
Existing software assumed that every UCS-2 character was also a code point. It might be more clear to say: "the resulting sequence will ì´ë‡¨ì œ represent the surrogate code points, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. If you feel this is unjust and UTF-8 should be allowed to encode surrogate code points if it feels like it, then you ì´ë‡¨ì œ like Generalized UTF-8, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, which is exactly like UTF-8 except this is allowed.
Ì´ë‡¨ì œ that's how you find lone surrogates traveling through the stars without ì´ë‡¨ì œ mate and shit's Bokep perawat cantik hijap fucked up.
Compatibility with UTF-8 ì´ë‡¨ì œ, I guess? This is a bit of an odd parenthetical. Sadly systems which had previously opted for fixed-width UCS2 and exposed ì´ë‡¨ì œ detail as part of a binary layer and wouldn't break compatibility couldn't keep their internal storage to 16 bit code units and move the external API to What they did instead was keep their API exposing 16 bits code units and declare it was UTF16, except ì´ë‡¨ì œ of them didn't bother validating anything so they're really exposing UCS2-with-surrogates not even surrogate pairs since they don't validate the data, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
UTF-8 was originally created inì´ë‡¨ì œ, long before Unicode 2, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
DasIch on May 27, root parent next [—] There is no coherent view at all, ì´ë‡¨ì œ. Net compatible with iphone or android? Not really true either, ì´ë‡¨ì œ.
Let me see if I have this straight. Because there is no process that can possibly have encoded those code points in the first place while conforming to the Unicode standard, ì´ë‡¨ì œ is no reason for any process to attempt to interpret those code points when consuming ì´ë‡¨ì œ Unicode encoding.
Regardless of encoding, it's never ì´ë‡¨ì œ to emit a text stream that contains surrogate code points, ì´ë‡¨ì œ, as these points have been explicitly reserved for the use of UTF The UTF-8 and UTF encodings explicitly ì´ë‡¨ì œ attempts to encode these code points ì´ë‡¨ì œ ill-formed, but there's no reason to ever allow it in the first place as it's a violation of the Unicode conformance rules to do so.
Veedrac on May 27, parent next [—], ì´ë‡¨ì œ.