Click here to know more. The question is whether it is a good consideration. Are you a practicing lawyer?
M.M. John v. Elamma | Kerala High Court | Judgment | Law | CaseMine
Nambiar M. Is keyword research taking most of your time? Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature. Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers About V elamma prospective clients. Share Close. Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest, About V elamma.
Name of party represented -- Select Claim this judgment Submit Cancel. Illustration h to S, About V elamma. The agreement is void, as its object is unlawful, About V elamma. It is stated in About V elamma Judgment of the lower appellate court that the principle of novation will apply to the facts of the case.
The substantial questions of law on which notice About V elamma ordered by this Court read as follows: a When there is no privity of contract between 1st plaintiff and 1st defendant can Ext. This is a paid feature. In case of any confusion, About V elamma, feel free to reach out to us. About V elamma here to upload. In this case the parties to the original transaction even if it is to be assumed that there was an original agreement are not parties to Ext.
Seethavanna 2 KLT 15 has also taken the view that one of the requisites of novation is the agreement of all the parties to the new agreement In Ext. A-1 the first defendant has undertaken to discharge the debt allegedly due do the plaintiffs 2 and 3 from the 3rd defendant by payment to the first plaintiff.
Are you a practicing lawyer? Elamma Kerala High Court Jun 2, Case Information. Select Preference. By clicking on this tab, you are expressly stating that you were one of the attorneys appearing in this matter. It seems that the court below in a casual manner has passed Exhibit P7 order by stating that no objection has been filed. For the principle of novation to apply the parties to the original agreement must be parties to the subsequent agreement also.
In Ext. A-1 it is stated that the third defendant About V elamma certain amounts to plaintiffs 2 and 3 and the first defendant has undertaken to pay the amount to the first plaintiff. Parties shall bear their cost throughout. Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature. For such a contract of guarantee also, there About V elamma be some consideration. If the third defendant had committed an offence, About V elamma, then alone he could be subjected to prosecution.
Load More. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization. It is stated by the lower appellate court that the admitted case of the parties is that the first defendant put the signature on their assurance of not launching criminal prosecution against the third defendant, About V elamma. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Anything relating to the southern boundary of the plaint schedule property or the existence of any road out side through the southern boundary of the plaint schedule property, About V elamma, is not a matter in controversy in the suit. Before confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly read and verified the judgment, About V elamma. Click here to upload. Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The next point to be considered in this case is whether there is any privity of contract between the first plaintiff and the original defendant and whether there is good consideration for Ext.
A-1 agreement. Create your profile now Close. About V elamma learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the original defendant had undertaken the liability of the third defendant by executing Ext.
A-1 agreement and the same is enforceable by the plaintiff. He has not been able to give any evidence with regard to the threat or coercion exerted by the first plaintiff or plaintiffs 2 and 3.
In this case also, even accepting the contention of the learned counsel for the respondents, the About V elamma by the first defendant to pay the amount due from the third defendant is not made on any corresponding promise made by the first plaintiff or plaintiffs 2 and 3. The second appeal is allowed and the Judgment and Decree of the lower appellate court are set aside and those of the trial court are restored.
Elamma v. Fr. Joseph Aranhani Olikkan | Kerala High Court | Judgment | Law | CaseMine
Create your profile now Close. Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile. The impugned order is liable to be set aside.
Add Cancel. John v. Click here to know more. Illustration a to S. The old debt of A to B is at an end, and a new debt from C to B has been contracted. If he had not committed an offence, to get a document signed by the first defendant for not launching prosecution against the third defendant for a non-existing offence is by itself an illegal act If as a matter of fact the third defendant had committed an offence not to register a case and punish him and to agree for such an arrangement also is an illegality.
Get 2 points on providing a valid reason for the above change. There is no case that the first plaintiff has obtained assignment of the right of plaintiffs 2 and 3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the matters in controversy in the suit is with regard to the rights of the respondents to remove soil from the eastern side and the western side of the property of the petitioner. Illustration c to S, About V elamma. The agreement is void. What do you want to About V elamma According to the lower appellate court there is novation of About V elamma agreement.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients, About V elamma.
Therefore the case of novation as found by the lower appellate court cannot be accepted. In that decision Lahore High Court held that the contract in suit must be About V elamma as void for want of consideration as the falsity was known to both parties and when the threat of bringing a About V elamma suit is really a form of blackmail and cannot be regarded as good consideration for the contract.
ON OFF. For the Appellant:. Print PDF. Citation Codes. Is keyword research taking most of your time? The further question is whether Ext, About V elamma. A-1 can be enforced between the first plaintiff and defendant and whether there is consideration for the same. Elamma v.
Save About V elamma. How is this helpful for me? The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters. How is this helpful for me? The matter is left open and is remitted to the court below for fresh disposal, in accordance with the law, by considering Exhibit P6 objection filed by the petitioner, About V elamma.
ISSAC Vs. ELAMMA
Try CaseIQ. Edit Citation. Before confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly read and verified the judgment. In case About V elamma any confusion, About V elamma free to reach out to us.
It seems that Exhibit P5 application has been filed by the respondents as petitioners, as I, About V elamma. The petitioner has filed a detailed objection in respect of Exhibit P5 I. A, contending that the matters requested to be ascertained through the Commissioner in Exhibit P5, are not matters in controversy in the suit and are not matters even related to the suit. Key Phrases are not available yet.
Leave your message here. Get 1 point on providing a valid sentiment to this Citation. The lower appellate court is not correct in law in stating About V elamma abstaining مرØباxxxsolo launching criminal prosecution against D-3 by Joseph and others is a good consideration for the first defendant to execute Ext.
A-1 in favour of first plaintiff. Once you create your profile, you will be able to: Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work. In the result, this Original Petition Civil is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The lower appellate court has held that abstaining from launching criminal prosecution against the third defendant is the consideration for Ext. A-1 does not state that the consideration for the agreement was abstaining from prosecution by Joseph and others.
Add Equivalent Citation. Learned counsel for the appellants relied on the decision of Lahore High Court. Once you create your profile, About V elamma, you will About V elamma Having sex with the 18-year-old daughter-in-law to: Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Please subscribe to download the judgment. Leave your message here. Are you sure? Upload pleading to use the new AI search. In the light of the above, the substantial question of law d and the additional question are answered in favour of the appellants.
ON OFF. By Adv. Sajeev Kumar K. Gopal R1 to R5 by Adv. Thomas Geeverghese. Case Information.
New Last Updated Block
By clicking on this tab, you are expressly stating that you were one of the attorneys appearing in this matter. Sign up to post. The contentions put forwarded by the petitioner have not been considered by the court below, About V elamma.
His evidence is not sufficient to come to the conclusion that his mother executed the document out of coercion as he has admitted that he could not know anything about it Therefore the story of coercion exerted on the mother has been rightly About V elamma against by the lower appellate court.
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile, About V elamma. Upload pleading to use the new AI search. The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who About V elamma be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
In the written statement of the first defendant it is stated that some persons came to see her with Kalarikkal Joseph and About V elamma to send the third defendant to jail in a criminal case and if she wants it to be avoided she must undertake to pay the amount if it is not paid by the third defendant She was thus forced to sign the papers brought by them.